Add Papers Marked0
Paper checked off!

Marked works

Viewed0

Viewed works

Shopping Cart0
Paper added to shopping cart!

Shopping Cart

Register Now

eKönyvtár library
FAQ
 

Great deal: today with a discount!

Regular price:
5 321 Ft
You save:
745 Ft
Discounted price*:
4 575 Ft
Purchase
Add to Wish List
ID number:835361
Author:
Evaluation:
Published: 16.03.2021.
Language: English
Level: College/University
Literature: 20 units
References: Not used
Table of contents
Nr. Chapter  Page.
  Introduction    3
  An Overview of the Liquidity Crisis    4
  Assessment of Derivatives and Risk Management Techniques (Part 1)    6
  An Overview of the Orange County Crisis    8
  Assessment of Derivatives and Risk Management Techniques (Part 2)    9
  Orange County Recovery Plan    11
  Conclusions    12
  Appendix 1    14
  References    16
Extract

Conclusions
The practise of combination derivatives into complex financial products has shown that the risk on the balance sheet is only the tip of an iceberg of the actual combination of market, liquidity and credit risks that has been created (Rajan, 2005). One of the main issues with derivative financial products, such as CDO, CDS, inverse floaters and repos was that they were increasingly complex and opaque (Kolb, 2010; Valdez and Molyniux, 2010).
However, despite the complexity of derivatives, once measurements of risks are defined and correct oversight mechanisms put in place, derivatives on their own present no threat (Jorion, 1995). Al in all, even though Citron was not motivated by financial incentives and Orange County was not involved into the moral hazard in the same way as actors in the liquidity crisis; the insufficient risk management was the uniting problem for both crises.
Moreover, actions of both crises occurred within a particular setting. For instance, subprime lending triggered the liquidity crisis. The U.S. leaders, in turn, created the lax environment for the Orange County in response to the limitations that the county and local governments faced after Proposition 13 (Baldassare, 1998).
In the long run, even though mistakes in investing in derivatives had a big impact on the portfolio value and liquidity, the unwinding of both crises were still more related to the excessive leverage, lack of control, and relatively large holdings of securities (Jorion, 1995; Koselka and Munk, 1996; Marthinsen, 2009; Halstead, Hedge and Klein, 2004).
To sum up, according to Dunbar (2001), “market crises are not hurricanes, they are created by human behaviours”.

Author's comment
Work pack:
GREAT DEAL buying in a pack your savings −2 146 Ft
Work pack Nr. 1382948
Load more similar papers

Send to email

Your name:

Enter an email address where the link will be sent:

Hi!
{Your name} suggests you to check out this eKönyvtár paper on „Derivatives Markets and Risk Management Techniques in the Liquidity Crisis in 2007”.

Link to paper:
https://eng.ekonyvtar.eu/w/835361

Send

Email has been sent

Choose Authorization Method

Email & Password

Email & Password

Wrong e-mail adress or password!
Log In

Forgot your password?

Facebook

Not registered yet?

Register and redeem free papers!

To receive free papers from eKönyvtár.com it is necessary to register. It's quick and will only take a few seconds.

If you have already registered, simply to access the free content.

Cancel Register