Add Papers Marked0
Paper checked off!

Marked works

Viewed0

Viewed works

Shopping Cart0
Paper added to shopping cart!

Shopping Cart

Register Now

eKönyvtár library
FAQ
 
  • Critical Analysis of Differing Approaches in Legal Reasoning

     

    Essays2 Law

Great deal: today with a discount!

Regular price:
1 022 Ft
You save:
152 Ft
Discounted price*:
870 Ft
Purchase
Add to Wish List
ID number:934214
Evaluation:
Published: 10.10.2005.
Language: English
Level: Secondary school
Literature: n/a
References: Not used
Extract

When a judgment is made in Australian law, it is apparent that there can often be differing approaches taken when attempting to reach this judgment. There are two common views which are frequently taken in this situation, that of the activist reasoning, and that of the positivist reasoning. Each of these has the potential to introduce judge-made bias, and commonly arises from the judge's background or social origin. When considering a case, it is often possible to determine which approach the judge took in reaching the judgment, by taking into account the method of reasoning and authority the judge utilized. In the case of Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (1992) (the Australian Capital Television case), Chief Justice Mason and Justice Dawson administer two examples of judicial reasoning, and each will be analyzed and critiqued throughout this essay.
In order to successfully analyze the opposing judicial approaches, it is necessary to first define each. A judge who takes the view of positivist reasoning commonly favours logic and ethics. The judge will generally allow "consideration to actual practice over what is ideal." In simple terms, positivist judges will run by the letter of the law, with no contemplation of what may be more suitable.…

Work pack:
GREAT DEAL buying in a pack your savings −1 277 Ft
Work pack Nr. 1297508
Load more similar papers

Send to email

Your name:

Enter an email address where the link will be sent:

Hi!
{Your name} suggests you to check out this eKönyvtár paper on „Critical Analysis of Differing Approaches in Legal Reasoning”.

Link to paper:
https://eng.ekonyvtar.eu/w/934214

Send

Email has been sent

Choose Authorization Method

Email & Password

Email & Password

Wrong e-mail adress or password!
Log In

Forgot your password?

Facebook

Not registered yet?

Register and redeem free papers!

To receive free papers from eKönyvtár.com it is necessary to register. It's quick and will only take a few seconds.

If you have already registered, simply to access the free content.

Cancel Register