Add Papers Marked0
Paper checked off!

Marked works

Viewed0

Viewed works

Shopping Cart0
Paper added to shopping cart!

Shopping Cart

Register Now

eKönyvtár library
FAQ
 

Great deal: today with a discount!

Regular price:
3 068 Ft
You save:
582 Ft
Discounted price*:
2 486 Ft
Purchase
Add to Wish List
ID number:576988
Author:
Evaluation:
Published: 25.01.2011.
Language: English
Level: College/University
Literature: 12 units
References: Not used
Table of contents
Nr. Chapter  Page.
  Abstract    3
  Environment and a Man    4
  Resources and a Man    8
  Summary    11
  Literature    12
Extract

Francis Bacon said once – “all people are divided by two categories: for one it is easy to notice distinctions, for other – likeness”.
The division of people into classes is nothing new. From the very antiquity people were divided by welfare, origins, physiological parameters, interests, professions, dependences, illnesses – a man can be an object for endless divisions. Such division gives us certain picture of a man which stands opposite to us. Man and environment are like space. At first we scrutinize the structure of space, then its functionality, then possibility of using it and possible design, and more frequent than all, we see cracks in its walls only after the protracted time, when we are acquainted with it already. What are environment and a man? Each of us is free to judge subjectively. But is it correct to use terms like objective and subjective?
I like the expression of Oscar Wilde – “The man who sees both sides of a question is a man who sees absolutely nothing at all”. Exactly this phrase explains the term of objectivity very colourfully. People say that an objective man does not have prejudices. Then it turns out logically that a subjective man has many prejudices. Is widespread opinion that objective it is that, whom is characteristic a disposition of the crowd, and that the true and objectivity has only majority. A subject has the personal opinion and subjectivity, but similarly as well as a majority, he has the truth. A problem is in that that majority does not wish to hear the truth of minority. Usually in modern life if you define yourself as a man without crowd, you don’t exist for majority, because a huge exposure of factors is dependent on majority.
Which truth dominates in interpretation of environment as an object? We perceive an environment as a crowd or as an individual? I will endeavour to give my own determination for the term environment.
Indisputably, environment is one of the most used terms in today’s life. Environment is the quintessence which includes the following staples of life - water, earth, air, nature, and similarly – a man.…

Author's comment
Work pack:
GREAT DEAL buying in a pack your savings −1 835 Ft
Work pack Nr. 1237603
Load more similar papers

Send to email

Your name:

Enter an email address where the link will be sent:

Hi!
{Your name} suggests you to check out this eKönyvtár paper on „Environment and "Gregarious Instinct" - Interaction or Parasitism”.

Link to paper:
https://eng.ekonyvtar.eu/w/576988

Send

Email has been sent

Choose Authorization Method

Email & Password

Email & Password

Wrong e-mail adress or password!
Log In

Forgot your password?

Facebook

Not registered yet?

Register and redeem free papers!

To receive free papers from eKönyvtár.com it is necessary to register. It's quick and will only take a few seconds.

If you have already registered, simply to access the free content.

Cancel Register